In 1993 all but two U.S. Senate Republicans voted Ruth Bader Ginsburg onto the Supreme Court after President Bill Clinton nominated her.
 |
| University of Maryland 1977 |
|
The Eagle Forum had warned those "honorable" senators of Ms. Ginsburg progressive socialist demands, including John McCain, who still voted with the majority to confirm the former ACLU executive.
The Forum reported on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s thoughts for America's society in a report she helped to co-author, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code. While no one knew it at the time, the ACLU advocate, Ginsburg, was decades ahead of candidate Obama's desire to fundamentally transform the United States of America
in 2008.
The Eagle Forum reported on some of Ginsburg's desires, forcing social engineering onto the citizens of the United States, intentions the mainstream media has kept from a vast majority of the America people. Ginsburg's social justice ideals are deeply embraced by the socialists / Marxists that run today's new Democrat Party. The "acknowledge" in the above report reads as the contributors:
"A report prepared under contract no. CR3AK010 by Brenda Feigen-Fasteau, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and 15 students from the Columbia Law School, New York City was used as the basis for the Commission study. Ms. Ginsburg is professor of law at the Columbia Law School and Ms. Feigen-Fasteau, former director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Women1s Rights Project, is a practicing attorney in New York City."
So how many of the line items from the chart below did you know were recommended in the report directed by Columbia Law Professor Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
| |
The words “husband” and “wife” must be eliminated and replaced with “spouse.” (p. 15-16, 53, 64, 170, 177), [which would at the time undermine the federal DOMA law that defines marriage between a man and a woman.] |
| |
The age of consent for sex must be lowered to age 12.(p. 102) |
| |
Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts must be sex-integrated. (p. 145-146, 219-220) |
| |
Mother’s Day and Father’s Day must not be separate holidays. (p. 146) |
| |
Fraternities and sororities must be sex-integrated.(p. 169) |
| |
Government must provide comprehensive child care. (p. 214) |
| |
No-fault divorce must be adopted nationally. (p. 214-215) |
| |
Prostitution must be legalized as part of “privacy.” (p. 97, 99, 215) |
| |
Prisons must be sex-integrated. (p. 100-101, 216) |
| |
Bigamy laws would become unconstitutional as part of “privacy.” (p. 195-196) |
| |
Single-sex schools and colleges must be sexintegrated. (p. 101) |
| |
Affirmative action must equalize men and women in the military. (p. 218) |
| |
Women must not be exempted from military combat. (p. 26, 218) |
| |
Women must be drafted into the military when men are drafted. (p. 202, 218) |
NOTE:
A 2005 Slate article on Senator Graham, writes about Professor Ginsburg's age of consent comment to be reduced to age 12. The Slate writer reported that there was nothing like that on page 102. See his comment below:
However when reviewing the .pdf file with the link embedded on the above cover graphic of the article, page 102 reads as follows: (Note the last two lines.)
|
And as you can see from the above list, Ginsburg being an executive with the secular membership of the ACLU was a perfect match for the bully "civil rights" organization. She would have made Karl Marx proud.
Americans voting for today's Democrat Party are unfortunately not unlike Marx's defined useful idiots that once elected to office could be tossed aside in a ditch as so much acceptable collateral damage.
And you can see that the American Society of Newspaper Editors, (ASNE), formed in the late 1970's to push newspapers to correctly spin the news, was not unlike the Marx ideology in its "coloring" the news to slowly indoctrinate American readers. The ASNE's goal was to have positively written stories about illegal aliens for readers that would turn a negative of job loss into a positive for building the Democrat Party and its need for more new voting members.
In addition Ginsburg obviously was an active part of the ACLU's attack on any form of Christianity in government, be it federal, state of local. One of the ACLU's pet projects several years ago was to remove a very tiny cross from a city seal that represented a mission, which founded Los Angeles.
You can see for yourself on the left the size of the cross in relationship to the size of the seal's entire art, the huge center figure of a pagan princess seeming to have been missed by the pagans at the ACLU.
Read here how the LA police department had tried to save money after the city fathers immediately capitulated and agreed to remove the cross that was hard to see. The city progressives wanted to work closely with the ACLU to be sure they were being politically correct. By not having to grind off every single painted city seal from each police vehicle, the police department could protect their budgets by only having to reprint a "corrected" version of the seal and then paste the print over the original.
It sounded so logical. But in LA logic may not be one of the city's high points. That tiny cross turned into a little bugger, reported to still be barely visible through the newly pasted seal. The ACLU seemed to be delighted to take its crooked fascist finger and point it to the cop car, "No, no no, we can still see you, little cross."
The cost of changing all the seals throughout the government from police cars to stationary was astonishing. But hey, the ACLU didn't care. It wasn't their money. And the city fathers didn't care, it wasn't their money, either. The project would be funded by taxpayers who probably also didn't notice, too busy running through their daily progressive lives.
In the 1980's when newspapers had not been fully corrupted by the thugs at the ACLU, reports in the 1980s still dribbled out that the org was being funded over 70% by secular Jews using the ACLU to attack Christianity wherever it could be found in government. That was backed up by an event in 1977 when the ACLU, actually acting like a civil rights organization, supported the marching of a few Nazis in Skokie, Illinois.
Many surviving Jews of the holocaust lived in Skokie, reports in 1977 that over 30,000 of them left the membership of the ACLU. It was a moment where the ACLU realized it needed to change course and instead looked toward cleansing government of Christians, correcting its membership loss. Oh, and the couple of Nazis? They never did march.
Ironically the ACLU has also invited Islamic leaders and followers to join its ranks to assist CAIR and President Obama's relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood to merge Muslim traditions into United States law. One day soon the ACLU's actions could guarantee Sharia Law for resolving Islamic family matters wherever a mosque has been built in the U.S., putting women and children into harm's way and away from the protection of the U.S. Constitution.
Concerning the ACLU, did I mention the 2001 law suit by Barbara Curley against NAMBLA in the murder in 1998 of her ten-year old son, Jeffery, by NAMBLA members? The police had reported finding NAMBLA downloaded material in the apartment of the murders, which may have helped the two men with guidelines on how to avoid notice when stalking her son. Guess who joined NAMBLA against the mother, reporting the NAMBLA Web site was a form of freedom of speech? The progressive socialist at the ACLU.
It therefore should be no surprise that after Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her recent decision on the court to no longer define marriage as between a man and a woman, and instead between two beings, that the ACLU has now decided to warn the Christian community it will have to consider carefully Christian civil rights complaints, as if it really had fought hard for them in the first place.
Check Mate!
But more important in all the information I have provided to you in this e-mail, Ginsburg recently revealed her true intention for her decisions on the court to push American law toward European law, thereby breaking her oath of office to protect the Constitution of the United States and almost seeming to want to shred it. And therefore she needs to resign.
The Web site, Neusysinc, reported Ruth Bader Ginsburg had bragged about how she was changing the course of the United States to the far-left American Constitution Society circa 2003, a far-left organization formed in 2001 with Eric Holder as one of its former board members.
Neusysinc reports this extremely disturbing message from the heart and mouth of the progressive socialist Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the ACS:
"Our island or lone ranger mentality is beginning to change. Several justices are becoming more open to comparative and international law perspectives. American lawyers' and judges perspective on constitutional law should encompass the world." - Neusysinc on Ginsburg
The editor of WorldNetDaily commented on this same issue on August 8, 2003, writing:
"With a name like 'the American Constitution Society,' you might think the organization would strongly support the Second Amendment’s explicit defense of bearing arms as a personal, civil right. Wrong. The Washington chapter this summer invited Matthew Nosanchuk of the Violence Policy Center and the co-counsel in the NAACP’s suit against gun manufacturers.
'How far the Bush administration can get pushing its NRA-aligned vision of gun rights, he argued, will depend on how hard others push back,' explained an account of the meeting on the website.
Another key aspect of the ACS agenda is to influence future appointments to the Supreme Court. Lisa Brown, executive director, tips off her concerns about future appointments: 'Need I remind you that President Bush promised that Justices (Clarence) Thomas and (Antonin) Scalia, who wrote scathing dissents in the two cases [UM Law School and Texas Sodomy], would be his model for Supreme Court justices?'
A survey of the entire American Constitution Society website shows one thing conspicuously absent – a copy of the U.S. Constitution!
Ginsburg’s appearance before this new extremist front group is just one more reason she should be impeached from the court.
She swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Instead, she has used her position on the court to undermine it, to illegitimately usurp authority from the people and the states and to provide aid and to politicize a branch of the government that should be above partisanship and the narrow agendas of special-interest groups. - Click here to read the full report
As a free people we need to remember Geoffrey Chaucer's warning in his classic writing of the Canterbury Tales, "If gold rust what shall iron do?" Well now we know the answer.
With a U.S. Supreme Court member disrespecting the Constitution they took an oath to protect, such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg, so why not a president of the United States? And to make it more suspect that president, as a candidate for the office in 2008, reported that Ginsburg was the kind of supreme court judge he would want to appoint.
Again. "If gold can rust, why not iron and the rest of the metals?"
So is the corruption of Ginsburg dripping down from the Supreme Court and onto the highest federal offices in the land where "we the people" can no longer trust what the President of the United States says, his attorney general, or the heads of all the federal agencies such as the IRS, EPA, FBI, CIA and the list goes on?
This corruption therefore is no longer a question but now proven with one of Obama's early Czars, Janet Napolitano, who recently retired as head of the Department of Homeland Security. When she later went on to serve as President of the University of California in 2016, reports were abound that she advised her staff and all professors they were NOT to tell university students that America was an exceptional nation.
From Ginsburg, to Obama, and then to Napolitano, the cycle of corruption is complete.
Check Mate.
Finally, now you know why the corrupted progressives of the new Democrat Party are always represented by funding socialist / Marxist groups such as Van Jones Color of Change, MoveOn, DailyKOS, ASNE, Huffington Post, Hillary Clinton's MediaMatters, CNN and the Slate to name a few.
Even billionaire George Soro's was discovered to have helped finance many of these groups including others along with the ACLU with tens-of-millions of dollars to push socialism onto the American people through the media citizens believed could be trusted through our founders allowing freedom of the press. Those founders had hope a free media would inform the people rather than trick them as is happening today.
And more importantly now you also know why they HATE a current member of the Supreme Court who does follow the Constitution and breathe upon it to keep it relevant for over three-hundred million American citizens.
He is Associate Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court.
Below is his 2016 commencement address to the graduates of Hillsdale College. Listen to his wisdom of love of America as an African American descended from slaves, and you will know why the progressive socialists of the Congressional Black Caucus openly despise his conservatism.
Even Obama, as mentioned, prefers the corruption of Ginsburg over Thomas and his protection of the Constitution. I wouldn't be surprised if reports came out that Obama, after January 20, 2017, would be heading up the new Washington D.C. law firm of Davis, Ayers and Alinsky. He did say as candidate for president in 2008 he never knew them, and the mainstream media agreed, smiling ear to ear.
Breathe in Chief Justice Thomas words, as if coming from our founders.
