"If I were the devil . . .

I would gain control of the most powerful nation in the world;

I would delude their minds into thinking that they had come from man's effort, instead of God's blessings;

I would promote an attitude of loving things and using people, instead of the other way around;

I would dupe entire states into relying on gambling for their state revenue;

I would convince people that character is not an issue when it comes to leadership;

I would make it legal to take the life of unborn babies;

I would make it socially acceptable to take one's own life, and invent machines to make it convenient;

I would cheapen human life as much as possible so that life of animals are valued more than human beings;

I would take God out of the schools, where even the mention of His name was grounds for a lawsuit;

I would come up with drugs that sedate the mind and target the young, and I would get sports heroes to advertise them;

I would get control of the media, so that every night I could pollute the minds of every family member for my agenda;

I would attack then family, the backbone of any nation. I would make divorce acceptable and easy, even fashionable. If the family crumbles, so does the nation;

I would compel people to express their most depraved fantasies on canvas and movies screens, and I would call it art;

I would convince the world that people are born homosexuals, and that their lifestyles should be accepted and marveled; **

I would convince the people that right and wrong are determined by a few who call themselves authorities and refer to their agendas as politically correct;

I would persuade people that the church is irrelevant and out of date, the Bible is for the naive:

I would dull the minds of Christians, and make them believe that prayer is not important, and that faithfulness and obedience are optional;

[If I were the devil] I GUESS I WOULD LEAVE THINGS PRETTY MUCH THE WAY THEY ARE!"

________________________

* Source: erumors publishes the following comment on its Web site at http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/p/paulharveycommentary.htm , "According to WorldNetDaily, this was written by Paul Harvey and copyrighted by WorldNetDaily in 1999."

________________________

 

Freedom is Knowledge

** Note from Webmaster concerning a statement by Mr. Harvey:

Having been attacked by a advocating young-adult homosexual when I was a teenager, I can understand Mr. Harvey's concern in his comment, probably referring to the extra ordinary attacks on the Boy Scouts by the bully secularist membership of the ACLU, which Bill O'Reilly of Fox News calls Fascist, referring to the dictionary by definition, O'Reilly's viewership is over two million a night around the world.

It is true that any young, healthy straight man, who is introduced into the homosexual lifestyles through forced sex, can become homosexual through the destruction of their self-esteem after their being violated, not born into the lifestyle by choice. Many homosexuals center their lives upon their heavy sex drives, males for instance calling the scrotum that holds the male testicles as "the basket."

And Harvey's comment about some in society marveling at the homosexual lifestyle, is also true. For example, when two deaf lesbian women recently used DNA science to make a test-tube baby so it would be born 100% deaf like them, (purposely creating a deformed individual in their words, for their pleasure), the elitists of the press and the secular membership of the ACLU said nothing about this baby being denied its civil rights to be born normal. Instead the baby was treated like a test-tube frog born with an extra leg coming off its head, these organizations through their silence seeming to marvel at the abuse.

I'm not against the homosexual community, having lived around their lifestyle in southeast Florida and worked with them in Hollywood, California. But they really do need to bear the responsibility for allowing advocates to run their show, causing a lot of anger and mistrust of their lifestyle from others, which is going to be very hard to turnaround.

For instance, I don't remember the homosexual community attacking their organization GLAAD when it was involved in stopping the reporting in the media of the death of thirteen-year old Jesse Dirkhising in 1999 in Rogers, Arkansas, the press across the country virtually refusing to print the story of this boy's horrific death at the hands of two older men. These adults then defecated on the boy's dead body after they had murdered him. Yet this same media that avoided Jesse's story had a shark feeding at the abduction of Elizabeth Smart.

People can smell the stink of America's corrupted press, whether it's the New York Times allowing reporters to create stories as if they were the truth, the L.A. Times doctoring a photo to made our troops in Iraq look like they were going to shoot homeless civilians, or CBS News trying to take down the President of the United States with documents they were told were forged, yet ignored the warnings. As one news analysis said, "CBS saw it as too good to check."

Cathy Renna, responsible in 1999 for the PR releases by GLAAD, said only a few months after Jesse's death that GLAAD had over 1,500 advocating reporters in the press rooms of America, and therefore journalists no longer needed to get the other side of the story. This created a major crack in the foundation of the trust the public had for its press, unbelievably caused not by the people, but by a few like Ms. Renna who are elite members of private organizations like GLAAD and the ACLU, hijacking the media and steering it with the arrogance of the captain of the Titanic.

The press, as proven again by the recent debacle at CBS News, cannot be trusted as it continues to abuse the privilege that was provided it by the establishment of the Fourth Estate, formed by our forefathers to protect this democracy by reporting the news without coloring it. The concept was based on the principle that with a free press the people then could make their own decisions.

But too many elite editors want to shape and color the news that people read to create the outcomes they want. Why else would the press need the relatively new central clearing house, the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE), formed recent in the 1970s to help it color the news before people are allowed to read it?

No longer do newspapers reflect the wonderful individuality of American communities. They instead now try to infect these very same communities with their sick politically-correct concepts and agenda that wants to secularize America while continuing to reduce responsibility of the American family in raising its young.

For instance, have you recently read in your newspaper that the ACLU was supporting NAMBLA pro bono in a lawsuit that has now gone on now for years, the mother of a dead ten-year old boy who had been killed by a member of NAMBLA, the man saying he got the idea from NAMBLA's Web site. The mother only wanted to taken down the offensive Web site so other boys could not be murdered. The ACLU, instead, has called the information on NAMBLA's Web site freedom of speech.

Your having to read this news event here is a sad commentary on the lies you are already fed by the press, along with stories that are kept from you to protect these private organizations that control the media with an iron fist.