The Shepp Report

Special Edition

The Continued Ugly Symbolism Of Obama's Dirty Progressives

January 25, 2017

 

 

Progressive Socialists Come To Trash America

Birds of a feather, flock together, or in the words of Obama, "Hope and Change." - Webmaster

We're Too Elite: Let The Government Pay To Pick Up Our Trash, Abort Our Babies.

 

October 2010: Liberal's One Nation Rally In Washington D.C.

"Fast food remnants littered the area below the Memorial. Empty water bottles were omnipresent as were discarded stick-mounted signs. The limited park-provided trash bins were almost works of art. The trashcan heaps bursting upwards looked like images of volcanoes caught mid-eruption, to say nothing of the areas surrounding the bins. Pompeii never had a chance." - Daily Caller

"As the ralliers began to disperse from the “One Nation” rally around 4 p.m., one thing was immediately clear: the area around the Lincoln Memorial had become a landfill." - TheBoldCorsicanFlame

Photo Source: TheBoldCorsicanFlame

 

January 2017: Liberal's Women Rally In Washington D.C.

"They want equality but expect others to clean up their trash. You broads are disgusting pigs." - GatewayPundit

Liberal Women March against Trump – [As usual], then leave trash heaps for someone else to clean up - GatewayPundit

Photo Source - GatewayPundit

Google Images: More trash photos from Women's March of January 21, 2017

 

___________________________________

 

 

Billionaire George Soros Has Ties To More Than 50 ‘Partners’ Of The Women’s March On Washington

"What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? Turns out, it’s quite significant." - NYLive / NewYorkTimes

 

Article by Arasra Q. Nomani, January 20, 2017, NYLive

 

'The other Soros ties with 'Women’s March' organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as 'a leader of tomorrow' as a march co-chair and another official as 'the head of logistics').'

 

"In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the 'Women’s March on Washington'?

The  Guardian has touted the 'Women’s March on Washington' as a 'spontaneous' action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the 'huge, spontaneous groundswell' behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as 'a grassroots effort' with 'independent' organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, 'The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.'

It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace. But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a 'women’s march.' It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump. 

As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcome, nixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda

To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are 'partners' of the march. Is this a non-partisan 'Women’s March'?

 

'Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an 'anti-Muslim extremist' in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its 'anti-Muslim extremists' report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)'

 

Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march 'partner,' told me his organization was 'nonpartisan' but has 'many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.' Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, 'This is not a ‘partisan’ event.' Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march 'partner,' returned my call and said, 'This is not a partisan march.'

Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama.

Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the 'Women’s March'?

I found out: plenty.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s 'partners,' including 'key partners' Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with 'Women’s March' organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as 'a leader of tomorrow' as a march co-chair and another official as 'the head of logistics').

Other Soros grantees who are 'partners' in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.  

On the issues I care about as a Muslim, the 'Women’s March,' unfortunately, has taken a stand on the side of partisan politics that has obfuscated the issues of Islamic extremism over the eight years of the Obama administration. 'Women’s March' partners include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has not only deflected on issues of Islamic extremism post-9/11, but opposes Muslim reforms that would allow women to be prayer leaders and pray in the front of mosques, without wearing headscarves as symbols of chastity.

Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an 'anti-Muslim extremist' in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its 'anti-Muslim extremists' report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)

 

'Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, 'Kill Trump,' were not  'spontaneous,' as reported by some media outlets, the 'Women’s March' is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong.'

 

Another Soros grantee and march 'partner' is the Arab-American Association of New York, whose executive director, Linda Sarsour, is a march co-chair. When I co-wrote a piece, arguing that Muslim women don’t have to wear headscarves as a symbol of 'modesty,' she attacked the coauthor and me as 'fringe.'

Earlier, at least 33 of the 100 'women of color,' who initially protested the Trump election in street protests, worked at organizations that receive Soros funding, in part for 'black-brown' activism. Of course, Soros is an 'ideological philanthropist,' whose interests align with many of these groups, but he is also a significant political donor. In Davos, he told reporters that Trump is a 'would-be dictator.'

A spokeswoman for Soros’s Open Society Foundations, said in a statement, 'There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections. There is no truth to these reports.' She added, 'We support a wide range of organizations — including those that support women and minorities who have historically been denied equal rights. Many of whom are concerned about what policy changes may lie ahead. We are proud of their work. We of course support the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and petition their government—a vital, and constitutionally safeguarded, pillar of a functioning democracy.'

Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, 'Kill Trump,' were not  'spontaneous,' as reported by some media outlets, the 'Women’s March' is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, 'women' have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was 'sad' the march’s organizers masked their politics. 'I want love for everyone,' she said. 

The left’s fierce identity politics and its failure on Islamic extremism lost my vote this past election, and so, as the dawn’s first light breaks through the darkness of the morning as I write, I make my decision: I’ll lace up my pink Nikes and head to the inauguration, skipping the 'Women’s March' that doesn’t have a place for women like me."

 

Article by Arasra Q. Nomani, January 20, 2017, NYLive

___________________________________

 

 

News Networks Covered The Women’s March 129 Times More Than Last Year’s March For Life

All three networks combined had only given seconds of time to the pro-life march! - The Blaze
"Protesters' signs are left near the White House during the Women's March on Washington on Jan. 21, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Mario Tama/Getty Images.)" - TheBlaze

 

Article by Kate Scanlon, January 25, 2017, TheBlaze

 

"It’s anyone’s guess as to whether or not they will cover the 2017 March for Life Friday."

 

"The three major broadcast news networks — ABC, CBS and NBC — covered the recent Women’s March on Washington 129 times more than they did last year’s March for Life, according to a new study by the conservative Media Research Center.

Protesters gathered in the nation’s capital Saturday in response to the inauguration of President Donald Trump.

According to the MRC study, ABC, CBS and NBC spent at least one hour, 15 minutes and 18 seconds on the Women’s March.

The 2016 March for Life earned only 35 seconds of coverage FROM THE THREE NETWORKS — 13 seconds before it took place, and 22 seconds after it took place. The Women’s March was granted 23 minutes of coverage before it took place.

The study also found that although the Women’s March made headlines for revoking the partnership of several pro-life organizations, that controversy was not covered by the networks.

In her analysis for the Media Research Center, Newsbusters’ Katie Yoder wrote, 'It’s anyone’s guess as to whether or not they will cover the 2017 March for Life Friday.'” - Read More / TheBlaze

 

Article by Kate Scanlon, January 25, 2017, TheBlaze

___________________________________

 

 

 

‘The View’ Ladies Support DC Liberal Women’s March Formed By Pro-Sharia Woman With Ties To Hamas.

"At the end of their show Wednesday, all five View ladies appeared either wearing or holding signature pink hats ('pussy hats') in support of the march. 'So, you’ll notice a couple of us wearing a pink hat,' co-host Whoopi Goldberg began, before citing the upcoming march as their inspiration." - NewsBusters

Video Source: ABC

"Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas." - GatewayPundit

Wretched Liberal Hag Removed From Plane After Harassing Trump Supporter - GatewayPundit

 

 

UNCENSORED: CNN Broadcasts Vulgar Madonna’s Repeated F-Bombs

"CNN producers were apparently too smitten with Madonna to think that she might actually turn vulgar during her appearance at the Women’s March on Saturday. And she — of course — did. The flagging [SNUFF] news network broadcast the singer’s speech uncensored and apparently without a delay, resulting in at least three f-bombs being aired in the middle of the weekend day." - TheAmericanMirror

Parental Warning!

Video Source: CNN

"Secret Service Will Investigate Madonna After Singer Says She Wants To BLOW UP The White House In Expletive-Filled Rant At Women's March." - DailyMail

___________________________________

 

 

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

[FOX News, The Five, has a love feast with the return of f-bomb Bob Beckel, who had said on CNN that there would be no way Trump could be president.] - LegalInsurrection

"CNN's Bob Beckel's BRILLIANT 2016 election predictions. #TFN-EXCLUSIVE." - Trump Fan Network

Listen To Bob Beckel in the above video while on CNN before the 2016 presidential election, reporting he IS AN EXPERT and that Trump could not win, maybe having a 2% chance. Sadly it says a lot about The Five and FOX News that would welcome back this arrogant f-bomb throwing Democrat with all his previous lies, which includes Hannity who welcomed him back with open arms. Something wrong with this picture. folks? - Webmaster

Video Source: YouTube

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for considering to pass along these e-mails.

Did you miss one of our e-mails? Check out the link below.

HTML E-mail Content from Freedom is Knowledge

On Facebook

We are the New Media

Sample Of A Few Archived Links

| Fascism Comes To America | It Doesn't Matter?! | What Privacy? | America Facing Evil | Whistleblower | Historic Biblical Times |

| Obama's 1990 article - “We’re Going To Reshape Mean-Spirited Selfish America.” | Print Page |

| The United States Flag: Federal Law Relating To Display And FAQs | U.S. Flag Code |

 

It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society - J. Krishnamurti

 

 

 

Freedom is Knowledge

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black newspaper burned down on November 10, 1898. The Democrat Party's machine showed its true colors in the murders of blacks in the Wilmington Massacre of 1898 and then NEVER LOOKED BACK. - Webmaster