When the military lends a hand at the White House
"If you are not scared now, you will be after our research." - Webmaster
Hillary said in her August 2007 presidential ad that the troops are transparent to President Bush.
Really, Hillary. Did someone forget about throwing stones when living in glass houses . . . to be more precise White Houses?
Does Hillary mean the same transparency she gave the military when she was First Lady, Bill and Hillary, reported by a general in the armed services, to have been offended in the early 1990's by uniformed men and women in the military serving around them in the White House?
In her younger days Hillary had been acting as an activist - hippie, supporting the Black Panthers that had scalded and killed their prisoner. One of the murderers later went on to Harvard after serving a few years in prison, while another one was reported to have been elected as an executive to the California Educational System.
Hillary went on with her life in college after the Panther episode to support one of the most socialist leaders of our time, Saul D. Alinsky. Click here to go to his rules to obtain power.
Please read Alinsky's piece linked in the above sentence titled, "Rules for Radicals." As you go through each one, you will realize these are the secret directives Hillary has been following since the days her husband was running for president, taking us into today as she tries to walk into the top leadership position in the world in January 2009, one that will change this country into radical socialism via the Alinsky Rules of radical engagement. It reminds us of the motivation for the movie, The Manchurian Candidate.
Boston.com now reports on a thesis that had been written by Hillary for her graduation from Wellesley College , which Bill Clinton as president had asked the college to bury from public view:
Source: Boston.com "But what is perhaps most striking about Hillary Rodham Clinton's senior thesis at Wellesley College is the way in which she grapples with such labels as radical and liberal and what they mean, questions she is wrestling with now as she runs for president.
The 92-page thesis, 'There is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model,' explores the life and methods of Saul D. Alinsky, a firebrand activist who organized the poor in Chicago to lobby in the 1930s for better housing and social services.
During Clinton's tenure as first lady, the thesis was kept under lock and key in the Wellesley library, and its legend grew among conservatives. Many speculated the thesis, written in 1969, would prove the 21-year-old political science major was an extremist in the thrall of an avowed political radical."
Human Events reports the same in a summary of the book, Shadow Party, but in greater detail which should raise the hairs on the back of your neck if she was ever to become president. It's probably why 45% of people polled said they would never, ever vote for Hillary. How much would that percentage increase after voters would have a chance to read the following along with her allegiance to Alinsky's rules of power for radicals:
"Ms. Rodham was an acolyte of Saul Alinsky, author of Reveille for Radicals and supporter of the radical group SDS. In her valedictory address, she called for the war to be brought home. Hillary's fixation with the left was no mere college flirtation. If anything she became more of an extremist during her years at Yale Law School. In the spring of 1970, Black Panther leader Bobby Seale and seven fellow Panthers went on trial in New Haven for torturing and then murdering a man whom they suspected of squealing to the cops. Mrs. Clinton led many protests, one of which ended with a fellow radical lighting fire to the Yale Law Library.
Mrs. Clinton also participated in the defense of the Black Panthers, doing legal work for Robert Treuhaft, an attorney for the Communist Party USA. Hillary's affiliation with Treuhaft continued and she interned in his office in the summer of 1971. With the failure to bring open violent revolution to the US, Mrs. Clinton turned her energies to undermine the country from within. In 1973, Mrs. Clinton worked for the majority counsel investigating President Nixon. While in Washington, Mrs. Clinton met Marianne Wright Edelman with whom she worked to found the Children's Defense Fund (CDF).
Source: Cultdeadcow Despite its cuddle name, the CDF is little more than a front for attacking the institution of the family. The CDF, which Mrs. Clinton ran in the 1980s, has called for full recognition of children's rights and government influence overriding the bonds of family. Mrs. Clinton's own views on family were clearly laid out in 1974 in an article she wrote for the Harvard Educational Review: "The basic rationale for depriving people of rights in a dependency relationship is that certain individuals are incapable or undeserving of the right to take care of themselves and consequently need social institutions specifically designed to safeguard their position. Along with the family, past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian reservation system."
Her opinions have not changed. In the 1995 Summit on Women and Family, held in China, Mrs. Clinton led the Unite States delegation, which proposed making sexual orientation a human right, giving children full self-sovereignty and the ability to sue parents at the UN, and UN monitoring of all media to look for negative and misogynistic stereotypes."
As Clinton started his run for president and caught up by the media with his history of having a long line of mistresses, it was reported that is was Hillary that went into damage control, hiring private detectives to dig up slime to embarrass these women who Bill had screwed or fondled, this time using the media as her personal water boy. If she was successful, and she was, any other women would be discouraged from coming out of the closet. It was probably why she never seemed concerned about a later alleged rape when Bill had been an official for the state of Arkansas, maybe seeing it simply as acceptable collateral damage for her future political career.
This certainly is a consideration when reading her past radical involvement in anti-America agendas, as reported above by the Columbia Spectator and her following of Alinsky's rules.
Source: Maya Del Mar's Daykeeping Journal So how did this couple go so far from respecting this country as a Republic to adopting a radical agenda to change its course in history to socialism? It started with their marriage in 1971, their relationship so close it was reported they referred to themselves as "Billary."
When we move ahead in time to the reports of Hillary and Bill wanting the military to dress in civilian clothes after Bill became president, we discover that was the least of it for the radical Hillary. Her obvious disrespect for those who serve in the military was brought to light at a White House dinner party as reported on June 28, 1994, by the Washington Times.
The Times also reported the party was attended solely by the partisan Democratic National Committee, an event where military personnel were made to become Hillary's waiters. The DNC had to have loved it, seeing Democrat members in Congress in 2007 saying the men and women in our military have now been defeated in Iraq.
Military personnel were reported to have been so angry, being treated as servants by the First Lady and the president, they told their commanding officer they didn't join the service to to only be abused by the Clinton's.
So one has to ask Hillary, "What's this stuff about Bush being transparent to the military when you basically seem to have spit on them."
(See actual story below.)
When the military lends a hand at the White House
"I read with disgust the accounts of the recent White House party for the partisan Democratic National Committee in the June 24 ('Military servants') and June 28 ("Service warriors") items in your "Inside the Beltway" column. It appears that uniformed military officers were ordered by some of President Clinton's 'staffers' to act as waiters and domestics, and pass around trays of hors d'oeuvres."
Read more when you access to the Washington Times 1994 archive by clicking here. Then scroll down to the story with the headline, "When the military leads a hand at the White House," and click on the link to register to read the archive. (A fee may be required.)
After reading the above about Hillary since her college days, this cannot be a surprise to anyone who has a brain. - Webmaster
Source for story: Washington Times Archive
_____________________________________
The Thirteen Rules for power tactics
Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
The seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment.
The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.
The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying "You're right--we don't know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us."
The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
Hillary puts Saul's rules into action for the presidential election (October 20, 2007)
"The first evidence of Bloggergate emerged in January 2005 when the two most prominent left-wing bloggers on the Internet — Jerome 'The Blogfather' Armstrong of MyDD and DailyKos founder Markos Moulitsas Zuñiga — both admitted to getting cash from Howard Dean's presidential campaign.
The scandal heated up in October 2006, when Republican blogger Michael B. Brodkorb of Minnesota, assailed by piranha-like swarms of leftist bloggers, revealed that his tormentors were on the take; that is, that they had been getting generous cash "fellowships" from an outfit called the Center for Independent Media (CIM). At that time, CIM was working from an office in Washington, DC owned by the Democrat front group Media Matters for America, Brodkorb discovered.
Curiously, it turns out that the co-founders of CIM, David S. Bennahum and Alexandra Savino, are both Media Matters alumni. Mr. Bennahum helped found Media Matters, serving as one of its original senior fellows. Miss Savino worked for Media Matters as a blogosphere analyst" . . . read more
Hillary - 1984
(If playing, turn music off on homepage)
Source: Drudge - YouTube Hillary recently called herself a "Progressive," which finally defines the radical objectives of the SP movement. - Webmaster
